Posted by
Brett K on Saturday, January 12, 2008 12:22:00 AM
While I was distracted from the South Carolina Republican debate
Thursday night by an incredible Sabres game, I was left in shock and
awe when I read some of the excerpts and recaps from it. I wish I
hadn't missed it, because it appears that the candidates appeared for
what they truly are.
There are two candidates that caught my eye
in this debate, and definitely for the better. They are Fred Thompson
and Mike Huckabee. Mike Huckabee exposed himself as the liberal,
anti-Reagan that he is. Here is one excerpt in particular:
"The
Reagan coalition certainly has not seen those same middle class,
working-class Republicans feeling a part of the Republican Party as
they should. Over the years, sometimes Republicans have thought that
one part of the coalition was more important than the other. I think
they're all important, and we need to recapture them. But we need to
make sure that we can communicate that our party is just as interested
in helping the people who are single moms, who are working two jobs,
and still just barely paying the rent; as we are the people at the top
of the economy."
What is the theme of that speech? Classes.
Class warfare. The difference between the classes. The failure of the
"coalition," an allusion right there to what became known as the Reagan
Coalition. That monologue essentially exposed Huckabee as someone who
does not believe in the success of what Reagan stood for, who does not
believe in the success of conservatism. His Arkansas record is hardly
conservative, and his campaign is populist rather than conservative
(which is a veiled form of liberalism: using big government to help the individual).
This
provides a nice segue to the other distinguished individual from last
night: Fred Dalton Thompson. He's been proclaimed by pundits as the
Reagan in this race, but he hasn't really been able to prove it. He
hasn't campaigned, and his depth has not allowed the opportunity for
him to provide 30 seconds sound bites to the media (resulting in his
being underplayed). He has never shown fire or passion. But last night,
he was on fire. He was a conservative. He was Reagan, and he called out
Huckabee. Here's what he said:
"Governor Huckabee's campaign
manager said it accurately in terms of what they believe. They believe
that it is over. This is a battle for the heart and soul of the
Republican Party and its future. On the one hand, you have a Reagan
revolution; you have the Reagan coalition of limited government, and
strong national security. On the other hand, you have the direction
that Governor Huckabee would take us in. He would be a Christian
leader, but he would also bring about liberal economic policies,
liberal foreign policies. He believes we have an arrogant foreign
policy in the tradition of "blame America first." He believes that
Guantanamo should be closed down and those enemy combatants brought
here to the United States to find their way into the court system
eventually. He believes in taxpayer funded programs for illegals, as he
did in Arkansas. He has the endorsement of the National Education
Association, and the NEA said it was because of his opposition to
vouchers. He said he would sign a bill that banned smoking nationwide.
So much for federalism, so much for states' rights, so much for
individual rights. That's not the model of the Reagan coalition, that's the model of the Democratic Party."
BAM!
Thompson: 1, Huckabee: 0. This is what America and Republicans
especially needed to hear. This was excellent PR for conservatism:
Thompson proved to be one, and he proved Huckabee not to be one.
In
a previous post, I stated that Thompson is an irrelevant factor in this
race because of his lack of energy and campaigning. But this moment is
what he needs, and it provides that energy and passion. I really hope
he can build off of this, and I hope Republicans start to consider him
more seriously.
I will be greatly disappointed if Huckabee is
nominated. In fact, I will be angry. Huckabee makes me angry. I wish he
knew the damage he is doing to the conservative movement and to the
future of this great party that has maintained control in at least one
branch in Washington every year (except 92-93) since 1980.
Thompson is officially my favorite candidate, and depending on his success over the next 3 weeks, he may just get my vote.